Archive for the 'Entrepreneurship' Category

Startup Weekend: VoSnap Recap

Tuesday, July 10th, 2007

I think I’ve finally recovered from the intense weekend which was Startup Weekend. What an amazing event, and one that I will continue to participate in down the road. While we didn’t meet our goal of having something live at the end of the weekend, I’d say we’re about 80% done (damn that last 20%).

What We Made:

VoSnap Logo

  • VoSnap, a tool that allows a quick vote amongst a group through email or SMS.

What Worked:

  • The people. Only in the last seven months or so have I discovered the tight Boulder tech scene. It was great to work side by side with everyone on a common goal.
  • Andrew Hyde - Great leadership, organization, and moderation of 7 minute status meetings and overall Startup Weekend flow.
  • It was amazing to have all the various departments working in parallel. It was so cool to be working on a server or some code, and then realize at the next hourly meeting that PR had developed some new press releases, Biz Dev had come up with some new monetization models, Creative with some new logos banner ads, or funny videos, and Legal, hard at work researching trademarks, SMS rules, incorporating the company ten different ways, and coming up with founder equity agreements.
  • The idea (if I do say so myself :) ). One of the coolest parts of startup weekend was seeing everyone in the room begin to understand the concept and the bigger picture. It was like a snowball effect - as momentum increased, understanding grew and and deliverables that were being produced by each of the different teams followed a common vision. I believe the original concept was well suited for the number of people in attendance, did not require specific knowledge about any field in general, was of a scope that could be completed in a weekend, and would, in the end provide benefits to Startup Weekend itself.
  • Feedback and support from the world, including posts on the Startup Weekend blog, press, TechCrunchings, our live-stream viewers and all the other positive feedback we received during our startup weekend
  • Startup Weekend is about execution. I’m tired of panel discussions, and passive entrepreneurship. There is a time and place for these things, but they tend to dominate the scene.
  • Seventy-two people for a weekend smells of chaos and disaster, especially when you consider the mythical man-month and conventional wisdom of that sort, which ended up being a non-issue for Startup Weekend.

What Needs Work:

  • Dev platform selection: Justin Shacklette nailed it right on the head in his comment on Brutal Honesty, a Failure and a Success. “…any random sample of web 2.0 programmers will include more Java than Ruby. But, and this is important, all Ruby web devs know the Rails framework. Java, and Java framework knowledge, is just too broad. You can have someone with 5 years experience on Struts, than doesn’t know anything about Spring Web Flow. And there is another tricky Java speed bump around tooling. A veteran Java dev may never have used Maven 2…for example.” I feel too many would be developers (myself included) were unable to contribute due to insufficient knowledge of Java framework(s)”
  • VoSnap. We’re working on it. We’ll get it done, and we’ll get it done soon. And it will be awesome.

I’ll continue to update this blog as more VoSnap developments occur, until then…

VooooooooooooooSNAPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPP!

LivePitch Presented by FundingUniverse and TechStars

Friday, March 2nd, 2007

I attended the LivePitch event at the CU Law School this morning presented by FundingUniverse and TechStars, and figured I may as well share some of my notes on the companies pitching.

The angels panel consisted of David Cohen, David Brown, Jared Wandry, Bob Smartt, and Bill Treadwell

The presenters and their presentations along with some of my thoughts (none involving any actual due diligence other than today’s pitch and any prior knowledge I may have about the company) :

Livengood Engineering

  • Problem: patient mobility in hospitals
  • Solution: Wheeled cart that supports a patient’s medical monitoring devices, IV stand, and medical supplies that they can push around the hospital.
  • Takes up same footprint as a typical IV stand
  • Final version exists, is sleeker and modular
  • Only product in category and concept promises many future products and markets such as military
  • IP and patents exist - product isn’t just a cart on four wheels - must be made safe for patients to use.

My thoughts: Very useful device and well designed (footprint of IV stand is important and the modularity of the final product is a good idea) solves a problem that I personally have never thought much about, but now I realize has some major potential. I gave these guys the bulk of my monopoly money, even though medical field is not really my bailiwick. It just made sense and seemed like the best business model and opportunity.

Magic Home Entertainment

  • Problem: Large music collections and physical music distribution issues in home make it difficult to be a music aficionado these days.
  • Solution: MoodSeer is a whole house audio music distribution system targeted at high-end audio enthusiasts. Supports multiple zones and a main theater zone to give whole house distribution.
  • Is wireless so no physical damage or modification of a residence required.
  • Targets Connected home electronics market: 15B now, projected to be 85B by 2011
  • Targeting high end audio enthusiast that already has typically 30-40K sunk into their audio components alone
  • Competitors are Sonos (sold 50K units in first year and a half), Harmony (bought out by Logitech)

My thoughts: I was pretty excited to hear the MoodLogic pitch as I only found out about them a little bit ago through their pitch at CTEK Angels Live. Being really interested in the digital home / whole house audio, I wanted to see if this technology was something I should consider for personal use in my home. After talking to the founders, I realized this product 1. Can’t stream from auxiliary devices such as a TV or XM radio as it is specifically used for streaming digital music i.e. MP3, FLAC. 2. Does not support synchronized music throughout the home. This seems to be due to the lack of determinism of their wireless physical layer. It’s also something I tried to accomplish with the Slim Devices squeezeboxes, but worked only marginally at best.

For $10,000 per installation, and having the first two problems, I really wonder what I’d be getting for all this money. The Zon system in my house ran $4000 for four zones, and add a few SqueezeBoxen to stream the music and maybe you’re at $5000 tops. Yes, I ran a bunch of cat 5 to support the whole house audio / Ethernet network, but synchronized zones is in my opinion the main point of whole house audio, especially when your house isn’t all that big to start with! I’ll still continue to watch this company as I’m sure as development proceeds they’ll work out some of these deficiencies. Going the wireless route to stream synchronized music might require some implementation of determinism at the protocol level. I doubt 802.11n has that yet. And then you have to worry about scaling and interference, and probably a million other things. Yikes. Makes me want to go rip up my drywall and install some more Cat5.

Kerpoof

  • Problem: Providing active entertainment for children
  • Solution: Kerpoof, an Internet destination for kids.
  • Provides an interactive and dynamic creative environment for kids to design artwork and scenes
  • Allows you to create an outline rendered version that you can print out and let the kids color themselves (cool)
  • Kerpoof sees the need as companies struggling to get their message out to kids.
  • They make money through advertising, branded scenes, charge per use and per traffic/time spent on the scene.
  • Parnership exists with Kidz magazine, have 5 paying customers and about 3 other similar competitors

My thoughts: Initially I was perturbed by the advertising supported business model on a concept that is targeting children. I’m not a fan of the current state of advertising everywhere, and I really don’t think kids need to be subject to it either. I spoke with Krista Marks, CEO and in addition to giving me a better feeling for the advertising aspect stressed Kerpoof as a means for active entertainment versus flash-based sites that are more passive, television-style. Their site, design, and implementation of the service is pretty slick, especially with the dynamic nature of the clip art collections and their effect on the scene renderings. Being able to create the instant coloring books pages is really nice as well.

Torii Medical

  • Problem: Catheter securement targeting IV therapy
  • Solution: Hydrogel based catheter securement device
  • Saves in IV catheter restart costs (70% of IV theraputic cases require a restart)
  • Saves in costs associated with infections due to catheters that come loose and breach the vessel wall, costs that run around $25,000 per incident, not withstanding emotional and physical trauma
  • The device is easily applied, and is basically a hydrogel, which is normally used in burn patients, but with a reformulated stronger adhesive that can last up to four days per application.

My thoughts: Interesting concept and product and a pretty large market. The presenter mentioned on a number of occasions that they are rendering their competitor’s product obsolete, however I imagine their competitors will be quick to come up with a version of their own, so I wonder if they can sustain their advantage.

Chaperon

  • Problem: Protecting your source code (software) from theft and piracy.
  • Solution: Lock it down with the Chaperon system,
  • Chaperon server is composed of open source software
  • Server uses public key security technology to prevent copying the software repository, disables copy and print functions of development environment (IDE)
  • Currently getting a lot of traction in the offshore software development outsourcing markets.
  • Chaperon uses a pay-per-use subscription model - recurring revenue.
  • Currently works with Eclipse IDE and netbeans

My thoughts: Kudos to Chaperon, leveraging open source to tackle this problem. I’m an open source advocate and believe there’s a lot of untapped potential in that space. As a software engineer by trade, I would more than likely refuse to work for a company that imposed a system like Chaperon on my development. 1. I believe it imposes additional constraints on the developer. 2. I can’t PRINT my source code every now and then for code reviews and debugging? Give me a break! Don’t make me look at the crappy (single) display most companies procure for their developers longer than I have to. 2.5 Currently limited to Eclipse IDE and netbeans. I’m a SlickEdit / TextPad / Emacs / vi fan, so I guess I have to throw those development environments away

3. I’m not really a fan of big configuration management and version control systems (Synergy, Clearcase - although Clearcase’s MVFS was really nice). Chaperon sounds similar to these. My experience is that it is very cumbersome to develop under these systems, and often requires a steep learning curve. Give me Subversion and TRAC, any day. 4. I question the operating policy and motives of companies that don’t trust their own developers. 5. How is Chaperon immune to a simple screen capture program, digital or video capture devices, simple pen and paper or things of that nature? I guess if a developer wants the code bad enough, There may be other non-technical ways to subvert the system (disclaimer: I haven’t done my due diligence in this department yet)

I will say that this system may be useful in protecting source code IP as companies leverage offshore / outsourced talent. But I guess as far as outsourcing to Bangalore goes, you get what you pay for, and Chaperon only increases the overhead costs (even if only to a minor extent) of those outsourcing activities.

The Winner Is

So those were the five companies that pitched at this event. Prizes were awarded to the audience and panel favorites. Prize award to each winner was a $500 cash contribution and $500 of in-kind legal services from Holme, Roberts & Owen, LLP. The audience picked Chaperon as their favorite (received $770 in total monopoly money), and the Panel chose Livengood Engineering’s “patient mobility cart.” All in all, it was a good event and a great selection of presenting companies.

An Interview with David Cohen

Monday, February 19th, 2007

The following is the writeup of an interview I conducted with David Cohen, entrepreneur and principal of Colorado Startups, LLC and founder of TechStars.

The Foundations

David Cohen, serial entrepreneur, founder, and principal of Colorado Startups grew up in a family of five in central Florida. His father, initially a partner of a CPA firm, went on to start and grow his own firm from three to around 50 employees. Cohen attributes a lot of his early business experience to his dad, who taught him basic life and business principles, supplied him with books on money management and financial topics, and instilled a “work for reward” ethic early in his life. Interested in computers and technology at an early age, Cohen was programming computers by the time he was 13 and took advanced placement Computer Science courses in high school.

Cohen continued his interest in technology by pursuing a Computer Science undergraduate degree at a Florida university. He supported himself during this time stringing tennis racquets in a golf and tennis shop. One summer during his undergraduate career, Cohen landed an internship writing code for a Department of Defense agency. Eventually, the undergraduate experience came to an end and Cohen’s search for any suitable programming job landed him a single job interview that would change the course of his career forever.

Doing Time in the Corporate World

Cohen’s interview out of college landed him a job with a regional planning council. There he was tasked with the development and administration of a Borland Paradox database that was used to dispatch vans for transporting elderly residents around town. Cohen became the sole technologist working at the council. In addition to his database work, he quickly assumed the role and responsibilities of information technology guru, keeping the electronic equipment working and changing the occasional forgotten password. His work on the dispatch database involved an increasing amount of custom coding such that Cohen eventually sourced and recommended the expertise of a company called Automated Dispatch Services to assist with the council’s dispatch needs.

Automated Dispatch Services (ADS) brought Cohen into contact with his future business partner, David Brown, then director of engineering at ADS who was responsible for installing the ADS dispatch system for the regional planning council. The ADS solution was a DOS-based application as, at that time (circa 1992) Microsoft Windows was still in its infancy and unproven for enterprise applications. Over the course of the next couple months, Cohen became acquainted with Brown during the install phase and in a support capacity afterward as they traded off pager nights, responding to round-the-clock IT support needs.

It was at this time that Cohen and Brown started postulating their what-ifs. They questioned the current state of the ADS application, and wondered if it could be implemented faster, better, and cheaper, using the Windows platform. Targeting the Emergency Medical Services (EMS) industry and focusing specifically on dispatching ambulances, Cohen and Brown quickly worked up a proof-of-concept version that accessed the same database as the existing ADS system. They even went so far as to give a demonstration to Brown’s boss, who rejected the prototype on the grounds that Windows was too new a platform, and that ADS was not interested in pursuing the software business.

Cohen had been with the regional planning council for over a year by this time. During this time, Cohen felt that he was working extremely hard, yet being compensated at the level of a “kid out of college.” He and Brown were the single points of contact when things when wrong, and felt as though they were adding most of the value to the company. They questioned the need to build someone else’s empire, when they could be building and owning their own. The Windows prototype soon became their corporate exit strategy and the beginning of Cohen’s entrepreneurial journey.

Beginning the Entrepreneurial Journey

Unhindered by obligations imposed by material possessions or family, and lacking much business knowledge including any understanding of angel investors and venture capitalists, Cohen moved to Arizona, hired a programmer named Eran, and started work turning the prototype into a real product. This team of two worked in 12-hour shifts, Cohen in the morning, and Eran at night. Having had all financing requests turned down by various banking institutions, Eran was compensated with the promise of 1.5% in royalties per unit sold for the life of the product, and Pinpoint Technologies was born.

Starting Up

Cohen and Brown contacted a former ADS customer and arranged a demonstration of their work-in-progress. At the customer’s site, they connected their Windows version of the software to the customer’s existing database and proceeded to present the customer with their existing data alongside maps in the graphical Windows-based environment. The customer was ecstatic and agreed to loan them $100,000 in return for 2.5% in royalties per unit sold, for the life of the product.

This seed money supported four individuals’ development for a year. Pinpoint Technologies released their first version of the software in August of 1995 in conjunction with the release of Windows 95. Their first release was a disaster; however an additional three months of bug-fixes resolved many of the outstanding problems. Finally, as their money was about to run out, they attended an industry trade show, courted an interested customer, and made the second sale of their product narrowly avoiding having to close up shop.

The Turning Point

When they started, Pinpoint Technologies was intended to be a lifestyle business. They imagined, best-case, that some day they each might be making $100,000 a year in salary with at most 10 employees companywide. They never intended to start this company with the sole interest of making large financial gains, but did it more for the freedom and independence of working for themselves. During their startup phase, their primary metric was the number of months they could afford to live on their current cash balance. Cohen described a feeling of personal relief when this metric increased to around 16-18 months.

The company’s turning point came during the Y2K craze as everyone scrambled to purchase new Computer Aided Dispatch (CAD) systems to replace their legacy systems affected by the Y2K anomaly. Sales during this year hit record highs and Pinpoint Technologies was bought out by ZOLL Medical Systems at this time. The next year, they were unable to sell anything due to the mass upgrade that occurred the year earlier. This was only a temporary problem however and today, the Pinpoint Technologies system has been deployed in over 600 cities and has dispatched over 80 million ambulances. Their company, now operating under ZOLL Data Systems name, is currently operating with annual sales in the tens of millions.

(more…)